Update GA resolutions

ns_ga_resolutions_loose_bge-m3.npy

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:40608a68390e6d46e74e3bccb8b7b53fe9ce65b9e208ce3250bb9fa2b307767b
-size 3617381
+oid sha256:6b18a332473b76328a232096ecdbd29987fb12a2c2bb187971e26389ebb0bf87
+size 3628317

ns_ga_resolutions_semantic_bge-m3.npy

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:652d41c2d202d41bd936bd7c93293b45faf73ae6b2f78105f252be093dc972ce
-size 1675392
+oid sha256:b80f18350323b7d359d9b55bb770f44bb46bbe58f2fbf63f7039d9b2a8d0d735
+size 1679488

parsed_ga_resolutions.json

@@ -13810,5 +13810,53 @@
     "title": "Removing Toxins from Infrastructure",
     "body": "The General Assembly,\n\nRecognizing the abundance of several toxins in infrastructure,\n\nConcerned with the safety risks of these toxins towards people and the environment,\n\nHereby:\n\n[list=1][*]Defines a toxin as any material which, under the circumstances in which it is present, operates, and is handled, creates a significant, quantifiable, and real risk of injury or illness by virtue of its biological impact to animals, or which degrades the safety or habitability of the surrounding environment at a faster rate than the surrounding environment can clear it or render it harmless, as determined by the Environmental Survey of the WA with the assistance of the relevant member nation,\n\n\n[*]Prohibits the further production, sale, or implementation of any piece of civilian infrastructure which contains toxins within member nations,\n\n\n[*]Mandates that member nations implement plans to phase out existing civilian infrastructure which contains toxins, and that, prior to removal, any civilian infrastructure containing toxins be marked with appropriate signage or stickers,\n\n\n[*]Further mandates that all removed civilian infrastructure containing toxins be properly disposed of, with procedures established for the steps of the process,\n\n\n[*]Further mandates that all sites where toxins are present be monitored for environmental effects, and that any areas containing more than the known limit for the given toxins in air, water, and/or soil, as established by the Environmental Survey of the WA, immediately receive an effort for appropriate environmental remediation.[/list]",
     "status": "Active"
+  },
+  {
+    "category": "Repeal",
+    "co_authors": [
+      "kavagrad",
+      "feux",
+      "rhaza"
+    ],
+    "council": 1,
+    "created": 1758501414,
+    "id": 819,
+    "implemented": 1764262802,
+    "option": 1074,
+    "promoted": 1763917203,
+    "proposed_by": "varanius",
+    "resid": 1385,
+    "total_votes_against": 3324,
+    "total_votes_for": 8254,
+    "title": "Repeal \"Protecting Press Freedoms\"",
+    "body": "The World Assembly,\n\nCritically concerned by the innate vagueness of clause 1’s prerequisites for the prevention of reporting, with neither “necessary for the wellbeing of society” nor "of interest to the public” being defined terms or even remotely measurable;\n\nHorrified by subclause 3.a., which exempts journalists and news organizations (both undefined in the target) from any civil or criminal penalties not outlined in other unspecified World Assembly regulations, even if that content is produced via actual malice;\n\nDisappointed in the whole of clause 4’s restrictions, mandating content warnings and permitting the restriction of content in accordance with what is “suitable for minors” or “inappropriate for consumption by minors” with no guidelines as to what that content may be, allowing news organizations to argue that any number of things are or are not culturally acceptable for minors and so prohibit their transmission;\n\nTroubled by clause 4’s decision to mandate the creation of content warnings absent any additional guidelines, giving way for potential abuse or neglect in this regard by the press;\n\nFinding GA#644 to be woefully inept at outlining the freedoms of the press much less protecting them, and critically overbearing in those areas which allow the government to limit misinformation,\n\nHereby repeals GA#644 “Protecting Press Freedoms”.",
+    "status": "Active",
+    "repeals": {
+      "id": 1074,
+      "council": 644
+    }
+  },
+  {
+    "category": "Repeal",
+    "co_authors": [
+      "pallaith"
+    ],
+    "council": 1,
+    "created": 1758860435,
+    "id": 820,
+    "implemented": 1764954002,
+    "option": 7,
+    "promoted": 1764608403,
+    "proposed_by": "cretox_state",
+    "resid": 1386,
+    "total_votes_against": 2228,
+    "total_votes_for": 9680,
+    "title": "Repeal \"Workplace Safety Standards Act\"",
+    "body": "The General Assembly,\n\nAcknowledging the allure of good intentions and strong advocacy for the rights and welfare of working people everywhere, yet\n\nHorrified that GA 7 cripples the work of emergency and medical personnel, encourages less protection for workers, and strains and burdens businesses with onerous requirements that do not make them safer, and\n\nConsidering the removal of a misguided resolution that endangers countless lives and makes the world even less safe than it was before to be of the utmost importance,\n\nFinds as follows:\n[list=1][*]The target resolution defines an employee "as any individual who performs a task or tasks for compensation that is not self employed, employed in law enforcement, or in the military." This definition does not extend exceptions to individuals employed in roles that are not law enforcement or military but can still entail the individual putting themselves in danger as part of their job responsibilities, such as firefighters, rescue workers, first responders, and medical professionals encountering novel diseases or on the frontlines of a pandemic.\n[list=a][*]This is highly problematic given clause 11 of the target, which requires "that employees not enter or remain at a workplace when their ability to work safely is impaired to the point of endangering themselves or those around them." Since aforementioned non-exempt employees can find themselves in situations where their ability to work safely is so impaired as part of their regular job responsibilities, the target severely compromises the ability of those and similar employees to do their jobs. This is especially inexcusable if the work in question involves saving lives.\n[*]The target’s second clause guaranteeing "the right of all employees to a safe working environment" is highly problematic for similar reasons, given that employees who find themselves in unsafe situations as part of their regular job responsibilities by definition cannot be guaranteed the right to a safe working environment without it dealing a body blow to their ability to do their jobs.[/list]\n[*]Section 3 of the target requires "that all chemicals be properly labeled, and that safety information be easily accessible in all workplaces pertaining to the chemical," with a non-exhaustive list of such safety information. The chemicals don’t actually need to be dangerous, or reasonably dangerous, or have a reasonable risk of being dangerous, or similar language. This turns a seemingly innocuous provision into a sweeping, invasive mandate that ensnares perfectly safe chemicals it has no business covering, imposing a steep and unnecessary compliance burden.\n[*]The problematic and highly invasive requirements imposed by the target incentivize governments, workplaces, and individuals who do not wish to be compromised by them to shift roles to a self-employed status, particularly if those roles entail being in unsafe conditions as part of regular job responsibilities. This denies people working in those roles protections under international law such as [url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolution/id=543/council=1]GA 543 "Protecting the Rights of Labour Unions"[/url] and can also degrade their protections under national law.\n[*]Other, more recent, better written resolutions protecting workers render the target unnecessary even in the absence of the critical flaws detailed in this repeal. While the target may have served an important role once, this august body has long since outgrown it:\n[list=a][*][url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolution/id=607/council=1]GA 607 "Health and Safety Act"[/url] comprehensively supersedes the target's coverage of workplace safety standards in many aspects, particularly where section 3 is concerned (and without a disastrously worded labeling requirement). GA 607 alone arguably renders the target superfluous.\n[*]Safety standards where hazardous substances are concerned are further covered by [url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolution/id=645/council=1]GA 645 "Responsible Handling of Toxic Materials,"[/url] [url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolution/id=699/council=1]GA 699 "Safe Transportation of Hazardous Materials,"[/url] and [url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=WA_past_resolution/id=439/council=1]GA 439 "Uniform Labeling of Hazardous Goods."[/url]\n[*]The ability of employees to secure better working conditions for themselves is covered by collective bargaining resolutions such as the aforementioned GA 543.[/list][/list]\nTherefore, with the conviction that redundant workplace safety resolutions should at the very least avoid crippling entire industries, and\n\nAcknowledging that the bar is underground, this body repeals GA 7 "Workplace Safety Standards Act."",
+    "status": "Active",
+    "repeals": {
+      "id": 7,
+      "council": 7
+    }
   }
 ]

small_scripts/make_embedding/embeddings_manifest.json

@@ -816,5 +816,7 @@
   "815": 814,
   "816": 815,
   "817": 816,
-  "818": 817
+  "818": 817,
+  "819": 818,
+  "820": 819
 }