UID int64 1.96k 182k | original_image imagewidth (px) 864 1.34k | edit_prompt stringlengths 10 33 | edited_image imagewidth (px) 864 1.34k | SC_edit_success float32 0 10 | SC_overediting float32 0 10 | SC_reasoning stringlengths 50 363 | SC_min_score float32 0 10 | PQ_artifacts float32 1 10 | PQ_reasoning stringlengths 124 428 | O_score float32 0 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
115,544 | Remove beer glass | 10 | 9 | The beer glass has been successfully removed in the edited image, achieving the editing instruction perfectly. The image remains highly similar, with minimal signs of overediting. Only a slight blur is noticeable where the beer glass was previously present. | 9 | 8 | The image is mostly clear with a well-defined glass object in the center. However, there are slight distortions at the edges of the glass object, and the background contains a few blurred areas and unnatural transitions. | 8.485281 | ||
115,544 | Remove foam on beer | 0 | 10 | The editing instruction to remove the foam on the beer was not followed. The foam is still present on the beer in the edited image. However, the edited image appears very similar to the original, indicating no significant over-editing. | 0 | 9 | The image is of high quality with minimal distortions. The glass and the beer are well-rendered with natural proportions and detailed reflection. There are no visible artifacts or blurred areas. The only minor issue is a slight unnatural curvature at the bottom of the glass stem. | 0 | ||
115,544 | Remove liquid inside glass | 10 | 10 | The liquid inside the glass has been completely removed in the edited image, meeting the instruction perfectly. Additionally, the edited image maintains the original composition and setting, indicating minimal yet effective editing. | 10 | 9 | The image is nearly artifact-free, with clear and sharp edges, and no significant distortions or unusual shapes. The glass and reflections are well-rendered. There is a very minor blur near the edge of the glass, but it does not significantly detract from the overall quality. | 9.486833 | ||
115,544 | Remove glass stem | 9 | 8 | The glass stem has been removed successfully, but the shape of the glass has slightly changed. The background elements remain largely intact, but the base of the new glass has been altered significantly. | 8 | 4 | The image has noticeable distortions in the glass structure, especially where two different types of glass objects appear to merge into each other. The shape of the glass is unnaturally elongated and bent. The shadowing and reflections are inconsistent, which affects the overall realism of the image. | 5.656854 | ||
115,544 | Remove background elements | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not follow the instruction, as the glass and background were completely removed and replaced with a different scene. | 0 | 3 | The image has several artifacts. The glass dish in the foreground has unusual and distorted shapes. The objects on the table in the background are also warped and appear blurry, contributing to a lack of clarity and harmonization. The overall composition suffers from noticeable distortions and lack of sharpness in deta... | 0 | ||
30,635 | Remove person | 9 | 9 | The person has been successfully removed, and the throne area has been reasonably filled with matching textures. The overall environment remains largely unchanged, maintaining the consistency of the scene. | 9 | 9 | The image displays high technical quality with well-defined details and harmonious elements. There are no noticeable distortions, and object shapes appear natural. However, some minor areas could be slightly improved in terms of clarity, such as certain parts of the background. | 9 | ||
30,635 | Remove green flames | 9 | 9 | The green flames have been effectively removed from the second image while maintaining the overall scene and atmosphere. The editing is minimal and precise, leaving the rest of the image largely intact. | 9 | 8 | The image is visually striking with detailed elements, but there are minor distortions in some of the floating debris and slight blur on the background object to the left. Overall, the image is well-executed with only minor artifacts. | 8.485281 | ||
30,635 | Remove skull crown | 9 | 9 | The skull crown has been successfully removed from the character's head while maintaining the original style and elements of the image. There is minimal overediting, especially since the rest of the image remains consistent and recognizable. | 9 | 9 | The image demonstrates a high level of detail with minimal AI-generated artifacts. The proportions and shapes of objects are natural, and there are no visible distortions or blurred areas. The subjects are well harmonized within the scene. Minor imperfections may be present but are not noticeable on initial inspection. | 9 | ||
30,635 | Remove glowing eyes | 0 | 0 | The second image appears to be completely different from the original image without following the provided instruction of removing the glowing eyes. | 0 | 3 | There are noticeable distortions and unnatural object shapes around the eye area, with unclear details that detract from the overall quality. | 0 | ||
1,963 | Remove the person | 10 | 10 | The person has been successfully removed from the edited image, and the rest of the scene remains consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. | 10 | 8 | The overall image quality is high with clear details and well-rendered objects. However, there are slight blur issues on the objects in the background, and a slight distortion on the edges of some objects which slightly detracts from a perfect score. | 8.944272 | ||
1,963 | Remove lamp | 8 | 9 | The lamp has been mostly removed from the scene, but a small part of it is still visible. The rest of the image remains unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 9 | The image has high technical quality with minimal distortions. The body parts and proportions appear normal, and there are no noticeable unnatural object shapes. The face is clear and not blurred. However, a closer inspection might reveal minor discrepancies commonly associated with AI-generated images. | 8.485281 | ||
1,963 | Remove watch | 0 | 10 | The watch is still present in the edited image, so the editing instruction has not been followed at all. However, the images look almost identical, indicating no unnecessary changes, which means no overediting occurred. | 0 | 9 | The image is largely artifact-free with realistic proportions and well-defined objects. There's minor blurring around the edges of the fingers, but it's not very noticeable. | 0 | ||
1,963 | Remove vase | 10 | 10 | The vase has been successfully removed, and the rest of the image remains unchanged. The editing is perfect and minimal. | 10 | 9 | The image shows a high level of detail, with well-defined facial features and natural body proportions. The objects in the background are clearly defined and the subjects appear harmonized. Minor imperfections might be present but are not noticeable at first glance. | 9.486833 | ||
1,963 | Remove files | 0 | 10 | No change is observed between the original and edited images. Therefore, the files were not removed (0), but there is no overediting (10) as the images remain identical. | 0 | 9 | The image is mostly free of AI-artifacts. The body proportions appear natural, and the face is clear and unblurred. There is a harmonious integration of subjects and objects within the scene. The only minor issue could be some slight unnaturalness in the posture, but it does not significantly detract from the overall q... | 0 | ||
23,765 | Remove woman | 0 | 6 | The editing instruction to remove the woman has not been followed, as there are still women present in the edited image. The degree of overediting is moderate since the overall scene and composition have changed somewhat but remain recognizable. | 0 | 8 | The image is overall well-crafted with minor issues. There is a slight unnaturalness in some of the faces and body proportions, especially with the individuals in the background. The faces are clear, and the objects are well-shaped, but the upper section of the image hints at some subtle distortions. | 0 | ||
23,765 | Remove binoculars | 0 | 10 | The editing instruction to remove binoculars was not executed; the binoculars are still present in the edited image. However, the edited image and the original image are identical, indicating no overediting. | 0 | 8 | The image is largely free from distortions, and the subjects and objects are mostly harmonious. However, there are slight issues with proportions—particularly the overly large binoculars, which seem unnatural. The body and object shapes are well-rendered, and the faces are not blurred. The main subject's attire and acc... | 0 | ||
23,765 | Remove top hat | 0 | 10 | The top hat has not been removed in the edited image. Both images appear to be identical, indicating no difference between the original and edited images. However, the scene in the edited image is recognized as a minimal edited version of the original. | 0 | 8 | The image shows good technical quality overall with minimal distortions. The body proportions and object shapes appear natural. However, there is a slight blur on some faces and minor mismatches in harmonization among the subjects. | 0 | ||
23,765 | Remove flower hat | 10 | 10 | The flower hat has been successfully removed, and the rest of the image remains identical to the original, showing minimal and effective editing. | 10 | 8 | The image is generally well-rendered with clear details and harmonious integration of subjects. However, there are minor distortions in the faces, particularly around the eyes, and slight unusual proportions in the hands when viewed closely. | 8.944272 | ||
23,765 | Remove scarf | 10 | 8 | The scarf has been successfully removed as per the editing instruction, with minimal changes to the rest of the image. The overall scene is still recognizable and retains the original elements. | 8 | 7 | The image is generally well-executed with clear subjects and no significant blurring. However, there are minor proportion issues with the faces, especially around the cheeks and lips. Additionally, the flower headpiece exhibits some unusual shapes and does not blend perfectly with the background. | 7.483315 | ||
152,656 | Remove boxers in the ring | 0 | 10 | The edited image does not follow the instruction to remove boxers from the ring at all. The edited image is almost identical to the original with no visible changes regarding the boxers. Thus, it receives a score of 0 for editing success. However, the degree of overediting is minimal, so it receives a 10 for maintainin... | 0 | 8 | The image is mostly well-rendered with clear features. However, there are minor distortions in the body proportions of some figures, and one or two faces appear slightly blurred. The objects and subjects are well harmonized without any significant unnatural shapes. | 0 | ||
152,656 | Remove two people sparring | 9 | 10 | The two people sparring in the center have been effectively removed in the edited image. The rest of the image remained virtually the same, indicating minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image has minimal AI-artifacts. The proportions of the bodies and objects look natural and the shapes are consistent with real-world objects. There are no noticeable distortions or unusual body parts. The subjects appear well-integrated and harmonized with the environment. Minor issues like slight blurriness on som... | 9 | ||
152,656 | Remove person in black shirt | 8 | 9 | The person in the black shirt has been effectively removed. The edited image closely resembles the original image with minimal changes, maintaining the overall scene intact. | 8 | 9 | The image is largely artifact-free with no notable distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The subjects are well-harmonized with the background. Minor details in some distant faces could be slightly blurred, but this is a negligible issue. | 8.485281 | ||
152,656 | Remove wooden cabinets | 0 | 10 | The wooden cabinets are still present in the edited image, indicating no editing was done. However, there are no changes in other parts of the image. | 0 | 8 | The image mostly appears natural and well-rendered. However, there are minor distortions in some of the figures' limbs, and a couple of the subjects’ hands seem slightly distorted. The faces appear slightly blurred. Overall, the image quality is high with minimal artifacts. | 0 | ||
9,156 | Remove the person using lightning | 10 | 9 | The person using lightning has been successfully removed in the edited image, following the instruction perfectly. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, with only minor artifacts visible from the removal process. | 9 | 8 | The image is mostly well-rendered with dynamic elements like the electricity effects. However, some minor distortions can be noticed, particularly in the alignment of the subjects and some blending issues between the characters and the background. | 8.485281 | ||
9,156 | Remove stormtrooper | 3 | 8 | The stormtroopers have been partially removed, yet traces of them or their impact on the scene remain. The scene is still quite similar to the original in structure and composition. | 3 | 7 | The image has some distortions around the electric effects and some unusual object shapes. The subjects in the image are mostly harmonized, but certain elements appear slightly off in proportion and detail. | 4.582576 | ||
9,156 | Remove lightning effect | 4 | 3 | The edited image appears to have significantly altered the original by replacing the lightning effect with a reflective, metallic surface, which partially covers the original scene. This overediting does not align with the straightforward instruction to remove the lightning effect. While the lightning effect is somewha... | 3 | 5 | The image contains noticeable distortions and unusual object shapes, particularly the metallic structure in the background. The proportions of the human figure and the effects around it are somewhat unnatural. The lighting does not harmonize well with the scene, making it look less realistic. | 3.872983 | ||
9,156 | Remove the combat droid | 9 | 9 | The combat droids have been effectively removed from the scene. The background and action effects remain mostly intact, ensuring minimal overediting. | 9 | 4 | The image contains several distortions, particularly the inconsistent texture and pattern on the metallic surface. The hand and face of the character are slightly blurred, and the electrical effects do not blend seamlessly with the background. | 6 | ||
9,156 | Remove the hand | 0 | 10 | The hand is still present in the edited image, meaning the editing instruction was not successfully executed. However, the edited image looks identical to the original, indicating no overediting occurred. | 0 | 8 | The image has minimal distortions and the body proportions of the characters seem accurate. The electric effects are well-rendered and look natural in the scene. However, there is a slight blur and lack of detail in some faces and areas, which prevents it from achieving a perfect score. | 0 | ||
176,076 | Remove ducklings | 10 | 10 | The edited image has effectively removed the ducklings without any noticeable overediting of the background or other scene elements. | 10 | 9 | The image of the grassy field is largely free of distortions, unusual proportions, or unnatural shapes. There are no visible artifacts or blurred regions. The elements appear harmonized and natural. Minor potential for very subtle artifact detection could exist if examined closely. | 9.486833 | ||
176,076 | Remove mother duck | 10 | 10 | The mother duck has been completely removed from the scene, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the scene, including the ducklings and background, retains its original appearance with no significant overediting. | 10 | 5 | The image shows subjects that are somewhat blurred and could be better defined. The blending with the background is also not very smooth, leading to an unnatural appearance. The proportions and shapes of the subjects are not very clear, which impairs the technical quality. | 7.071068 | ||
176,076 | Remove trees reflection | 10 | 10 | The tree reflection has been completely removed as per the instruction, and the rest of the image remains the same without any overediting. | 10 | 10 | The image displays no significant distortions, body part irregularities, unnatural object shapes, blurred faces, or disjointed subjects. The image is artifact-free. | 10 | ||
176,076 | Remove tall grass | 2 | 2 | The tall grass has been removed effectively, but the overediting has significantly changed the overall scene, including the addition of rocks and more uniform grass texture. | 2 | 7 | The image is generally well-rendered but there are noticeable issues. The grass texture looks slightly artificial and overly uniform. The duck's proportions are mostly accurate, but there are minor distortions in the feathers and the area around its tail. The pebbles also seem a bit unnatural in their arrangement. Over... | 3.741657 | ||
176,076 | Remove water patches | 9 | 8 | The water patches have been effectively removed in the edited image, fulfilling the editing instruction successfully. The background and lighting remain consistent, however, the ducks have also been removed, leading to a higher degree of overediting as those elements were not mentioned in the instruction. | 8 | 10 | The image shows no visible AI-artifacts, distortions, or unnatural shapes. The grass appears consistent and natural with no visible blurring or disharmony. | 8.944272 | ||
181,718 | Remove microphone | 8 | 9 | The microphone has been effectively removed from the scene as instructed. However, the edit is slightly evident due to the unnatural positioning of the singer's hands and minor artifacts. The overall scene remains very similar, indicating minimal overediting. | 8 | 7 | The image has good overall quality, but there are some noticeable artifacts. The faces are slightly blurred and a few body parts look a bit off in terms of proportion. The lighting and shadows are well-handled, but some subjects don’t seem fully harmonized with the scene. | 7.483315 | ||
181,718 | Remove drum set | 0 | 10 | The drum set is still present in the edited image, indicating no successful editing. Otherwise, there are no apparent differences between the two images. | 0 | 7 | The image overall looks realistic, but there are some noticeable issues: slight distortions around some body parts, certain facial features appear slightly blurred, and some object edges are not entirely sharp. | 0 | ||
181,718 | Remove guitarist | 0 | 9 | The guitarist is still present in the edited image. Although there is an attempt to obscure him with a dark rectangular object, he is clearly visible, so the edit fails to follow the instruction. However, the overall scene remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 0 | 8 | The image presents minimal visual distortions and artifacts. Human figures and objects are well-proportioned and appear natural for the most part. However, some minor distortions are noticeable in the background and on the far left side of the image. The faces are not blurred, and overall subject harmony is well-mainta... | 0 | ||
181,718 | Remove singer | 10 | 8 | The singer has been successfully removed from the image. Minimal distortions are visible where the singer was standing, making the edited image look quite natural but with slight overediting effects where the guitar and background have been modified to fill the space. | 8 | 8 | The image is well-rendered with good clarity and minimal distortions. The body parts and proportions of the individuals appear natural, and the object shapes are convincing. There is a slight blur on one of the faces, and some minor inconsistencies in the background elements, especially with the lighting and shadows no... | 8 | ||
22,006 | Remove the person | 9 | 9 | The person in the front left was successfully removed. Minor remnants of people in the background are visible but overall the image closely resembles the original with minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image is highly detailed with well-defined objects and proper proportions. There are no noticeable distortions, body parts, or blurred faces. The elements are harmonized well, but there is a slight unnatural feel to the object shape of the chairs. | 9 | ||
22,006 | Remove red jacket | 9 | 10 | The red jacket previously worn by the person in the background has been effectively removed. The rest of the scene remains unchanged, showing minimal but effective editing. | 9 | 9 | The image quality is high with realistic body proportions and facial features. However, there might be minor imperfections in texture blending and subtle artifacts around the edges of some objects. | 9 | ||
22,006 | Remove glass of wine | 0 | 10 | The glass of wine is still present in the edited image, thus the editing instruction was not followed at all. The edited image retains all other elements identical to the original image, indicating no overediting. | 0 | 8 | The image shows a high level of detail and realism. However, there are slight distortions in the background, and minor unnaturalness in some facial expressions and hand shapes. | 0 | ||
22,006 | Remove black jacket | 10 | 10 | The black jacket on the man in the foreground has been successfully removed, and the rest of the image remains consistent with the original, with no unnecessary changes. | 10 | 9 | The image is technically sound with minimal distortions. Body parts and proportions appear natural, and object shapes are consistent. The faces are clear, with no significant blurring. Subjects are harmonized well within the scene. Minor imperfections may exist but are not prominently noticeable. | 9.486833 | ||
22,006 | Remove window view | 10 | 9 | The window view has been successfully removed and replaced with a brick wall and ceiling. The overall interior and atmosphere have largely been preserved, making the edit effective but slightly noticeable. | 9 | 8 | Overall, the image is of high technical quality with well-rendered details. However, there are some minor issues such as slight unnatural body proportions, particularly in the arm of the person on the right and some minor facial blurring in the background subjects. | 8.485281 | ||
25,804 | Remove earrings | 10 | 10 | The earrings have been successfully removed in the edited image, and there are no significant changes to other aspects of the image. | 10 | 10 | The image appears to be artifact-free with no visible distortions, unusual body parts, unnatural object shapes, blurred faces, or lack of harmonization among subjects. | 10 | ||
25,804 | Remove the person | 9 | 9 | The person has been successfully removed, leaving a clean background while preserving the integrity of the scene. Minor artifacts where the person was might prevent a perfect score. | 9 | 7 | The image appears to be largely artifact-free, with a clear and crisp depiction of geometric shapes. However, there is a slight distortion where the figure intersects with the triangular shapes, and some minor blur can be noticed around the figure. | 7.937254 | ||
25,804 | Remove geometric panel | 1 | 8 | The geometric panel in the background has been partially modified but is still evident. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged with minimal overediting. | 1 | 8 | The overall image quality is high with no major distortions or unusual body parts. The face is clear and well-rendered. However, there are slight background artifacts and minor unnatural shapes on the left side, which reduce the score. | 2.828427 | ||
25,804 | Remove statue | 10 | 9 | The statue has been effectively removed in the second image, accomplishing the editing instruction perfectly. The overall image remains mostly unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. | 9 | 9 | The image has very few distortions, and the proportions of body parts are normal. The face is clear and not blurred. The subject seems harmonized with the background. A very minor potential artifact could exist, but it is not noticeable. | 9 | ||
25,804 | Remove dress | 0 | 7 | The editing instruction to 'Remove dress' was followed in the second image, but this kind of edit is inappropriate and does not follow acceptable content guidelines. There is also significant overediting involved, altering too much of the original image. | 0 | 1 | The image contains significant distortions and unusual body parts, notably the atypical appearance of the chest area. The human proportions are unnatural and not harmonized with the rest of the body. These AI-artifacts are highly noticeable and disrupt the overall visual quality. | 0 | ||
92,971 | Remove waves | 10 | 9 | The waves have been successfully removed in the edited image, with the ocean now appearing calm and flat. There is minimal overediting, as the coast, road, and forest remain largely unchanged. | 9 | 10 | No visible distortions, unusual proportions, or unnatural object shapes. No blurred faces or disharmony in the subjects observed. | 9.486833 | ||
92,971 | Remove beach | 0 | 10 | The scene in the edited image still includes the beach area, though it now looks like a barren desert. The edit did not follow the instruction to remove the beach entirely. The rest of the scene remains largely identical, indicating no overediting. | 0 | 9 | The image is highly realistic with no obvious distortions. The body parts and proportions are not applicable here due to the nature of the image. The object shapes appear natural, and the single car on the road is clear. The only slight artifact might be the transition between the two terrains, but it is very minor. | 0 | ||
92,971 | Remove trees | 10 | 7 | The trees have been successfully removed, leaving the main elements such as the road and the coastline intact. However, the overediting is noticeable due to the significant change from a forested area to a barren field, thus reducing the degree of minimal editing. | 7 | 9 | The image shows minimal distortions, and the body parts, object shapes, and subjects are well harmonized. The road and the fields appear appropriate and there are no significant AI-artifacts visible. The only minor issue is some repetition in texture patterns in the fields, but it doesn't detract heavily from the overa... | 7.937254 | ||
92,971 | Remove road | 9 | 9 | The road has been effectively removed in the edited image, matching the editing instruction very well. There are minimal changes to the surrounding areas, preserving the original scene while accomplishing the edit. | 9 | 10 | The image is free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, blurred faces, and the subjects are well harmonized. The quality is high, and no AI artifacts are visible. | 9.486833 | ||
62,083 | Remove center person | 10 | 10 | The center person has been successfully removed without altering any other significant part of the scene. The editing instruction has been perfectly executed, and the image remains very similar to the original except for the removed element. | 10 | 8 | The image is generally well-rendered with smooth transitions and well-defined objects. There is good detail in the background and the lighting is consistent. However, upon closer inspection, some of the human figures have slightly unusual proportions and there are minor distortions in a few of them. Additionally, a few... | 8.944272 | ||
62,083 | Remove billboard | 0 | 10 | The billboard is still present in the edited image, indicating that the removal instruction was not followed. However, the overall scene remains largely identical, implying no overediting occurred. | 0 | 8 | The image overall has a high level of detail and artistic quality. Most elements like buildings, light reflections, and the crowd are well-rendered. However, there are a few minor issues such as slightly blurred faces in the background and some proportions of the characters that seem a bit off. The central figure also ... | 0 | ||
62,083 | Remove skateboarder | 8 | 9 | The skateboarder is successfully removed from the scene with minimal disruption to the surrounding environment. Most of the original elements remain intact, indicating a high degree of subtle editing. | 8 | 8 | The image is overall high quality with most elements well-rendered. There are a few minor distortions and unnatural object shapes, particularly in some of the faces and body proportions of the figures, but these are not very prominent. The lighting and integration of subjects into the scene are well-done. | 8 | ||
62,083 | Remove left person | 10 | 9 | The left person has been successfully removed from the edited image, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The scene remains largely unchanged apart from the removal of the person and some additional graffiti, maintaining a high degree of similarity to the original image. | 9 | 8 | The image overall appears to be well-composed with a high level of detail. However, there are some minor issues such as slight distortions in the graffiti and some blurring in the crowd in the background. The people in the foreground are mostly well-defined, but there are minor proportion inconsistencies upon close ins... | 8.485281 | ||
62,083 | Remove right crowd | 0 | 0 | The right crowd has not been removed; instead, a pattern was added over the image, which does not follow the editing instruction at all. The pattern changes the image significantly, making it completely different from the original. | 0 | 4 | The image exhibits noticeable distortions, particularly the unusual object shapes in the foreground. The foreground patterns clash with the background, causing a lack of harmony. Some details appear blurred and unnatural, particularly where elements overlap or intersect. There are also visible artifacts and inconsisten... | 0 | ||
4,569 | Remove doorbell | 3 | 7 | The doorbell has not been completely removed; instead, it has been covered with a plain object. The edited image is recognizable as a minimally edited version of the original. | 3 | 9 | The image is mostly free of distortions and artifacts. The objects and shapes appear natural, and the colors are well balanced. The only minor issue is a slight unnatural blending at the intersection of the flowers and the background, but it is not very noticeable. | 5.196152 | ||
4,569 | Remove door handle | 0 | 10 | The original image does not contain a door handle. | 0 | 10 | The image shows a clear and well-defined door with no visible distortions, unusual proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The elements are harmonized with no blurring or artifacts. | 0 | ||
4,569 | Remove plants | 5 | 7 | The plants have been partially removed, with some flowers still visible. The edited image retains most of the original characteristics, but the editing is not fully successful in removing all plants. | 5 | 10 | The image exhibits no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The objects appear harmonized with each other and the image quality is excellent. | 7.071068 | ||
4,569 | Remove door panel | 9 | 9 | The door panel has been effectively removed while maintaining the integrity of the rest of the image. The edit is successful and minimal, with the edited area blending well with the surroundings. | 9 | 10 | The image shows no visible distortions, unusual object shapes, or blurred areas. All elements appear natural and harmonized. | 9.486833 | ||
4,569 | Remove camera lens | 10 | 10 | The camera lens has been completely removed, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The edited image retains the rest of the original scene without introducing unnecessary changes. | 10 | 9 | The image overall appears very clean and free of significant distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and unnatural object shapes. The textures and edges are well-defined with no visible artifacts. The only minor issue is a slight blur or lack of sharp definition on the door edges, but this does not significantl... | 9.486833 | ||
8,078 | Remove the people walking | 10 | 10 | The people walking have been completely removed in the edited image, and the overall scene remains unchanged except for the absence of people. | 10 | 9 | The image is largely free of distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The architectural elements and landscape are well-detailed and appear natural. There is a minor blur in the background where the sea meets the horizon, but it does not significantly detract from the overall quality. | 9.486833 | ||
8,078 | Remove the balcony furniture | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not remove the balcony furniture but rather significantly alters the entire building facade. The scene does not follow the editing instruction at all and the degree of overediting is extremely high. | 0 | 9 | The image appears to be of high technical quality with well-rendered elements and minimal distortions. The people, objects, and scenery are well-proportioned and harmonized. There are no apparent unusual body parts, blurred faces, or unnatural object shapes. The only minor issue is slight over-saturation which could be... | 0 | ||
8,078 | Remove the fountain | 9 | 9 | The fountain has been effectively removed from the scene, fulfilling the editing instruction quite well. The edited image retains most of the original elements with minimal changes apart from the removal of the fountain, thus not overediting the picture. | 9 | 8 | The image is highly realistic with well-defined structures and clear details. However, there are minor issues with unnatural object shapes and slightly distorted perspective in some areas, particularly with distant objects. | 8.485281 | ||
8,078 | Remove the trees | 8 | 9 | The trees have been successfully removed in the edited image, fulfilling the objective. However, some traces of greenery still exist, which keeps the scene mostly consistent with the original overall context. | 8 | 9 | The image shows a high level of detail with well-defined objects and a clear background. The proportions of the buildings and surroundings appear accurate, and the integration of elements is seamless. Minor artifacts could be present but are not noticeable without closer inspection. The humans are relatively small in t... | 8.485281 | ||
8,078 | Remove the building structure | 9 | 9 | The building structure has been almost completely removed, apart from some remnants on the right side. The edited image still retains much of the original scene, making it a minimal but highly effective edit. | 9 | 8 | The image is highly detailed with well-rendered objects and scenery. However, minor distortions are noticeable in the tree leaves and some areas of the foliage. The human figures are well-proportioned but have slight blurring in faces upon close inspection, which could be improved for a perfect score. | 8.485281 | ||
4,152 | Remove car | 9 | 10 | The car has been successfully removed from the image as per the instruction, and there is no sign of overediting. The edited image matches the original background flawlessly. | 9 | 3 | The image shows significant AI artifacts such as unnatural object shapes and distortions. The shape of the object is unclear, appears amorphous, and lacks clear definition. Additionally, the image has blurry areas that further indicate poor quality. | 5.196152 | ||
4,152 | Remove logo | 0 | 0 | The edited image has been completely replaced with a different car model and design. It does not follow the original image or the instruction to remove the logo. | 0 | 8 | The overall image quality is high with no significant distortions or blurring. However, the unusual shapes and unrealistic texture on the car, especially the wheels appearing sunken and the body resembling a cloth cover, slightly detract from the realism. | 0 | ||
4,152 | Remove air intake | 0 | 0 | The edited image does not contain the car at all. The scene is completely different, and the air intake removal task was not performed on the original image. | 0 | 9 | The image appears to be of a car roof cargo box with no significant AI-artifacts. The object shape is consistent, and there are no evident distortions, unusual parts, or blurred areas. However, a very slight unnatural texturing is visible on the surface, preventing a perfect score. | 0 | ||
4,152 | Remove front wheel | 8 | 9 | The front wheel has been successfully removed, meeting the editing instruction effectively. However, some remnants and distortions still show where the wheel was, slightly decreasing the success score. The overall scene remains largely unchanged, maintaining a high degree of recognizability from the original image. | 8 | 9 | The image shows high technical quality with minimal visible distortions or artifacts. The proportions of the car are natural, and there are no noticeable blurring or unusual shapes. The harmonization of the elements is well-executed. Minor imperfections are almost negligible. | 8.485281 | ||
4,152 | Remove license plate | 0 | 0 | The entire car was removed instead of just the license plate. | 0 | 9 | The image is generally clear and free of distortions. The object is well-shaped and proportionate. However, there are minor artifacts on the upper edges, causing slight inconsistencies. | 0 | ||
90,731 | Remove the person sitting | 10 | 9 | The person sitting has been successfully removed from the couch, and the background has been filled in appropriately. The objects around the area where the person was seated appear almost unchanged, maintaining the overall scene well. | 9 | 9 | The image appears to be of high quality with well-defined objects and minimal distortions. The furniture and decor are proportionate and natural-looking. The only minor issue is a slight blur on the edge of the throw blanket on the sofa. | 9 | ||
90,731 | Remove the blue chairs | 10 | 10 | The blue chairs have been successfully removed in the edited image without altering other elements of the scene. | 10 | 8 | The image is generally coherent with well-defined objects and proper proportions. However, there are minor issues with some elements like the slightly distorted basket and the slightly off perspective of certain objects, such as the table. There are no significant AI artifacts, but the slight inconsistencies prevent a ... | 8.944272 | ||
90,731 | Remove the coffee table | 0 | 10 | The coffee table is still present in the edited image, thus failing the editing instruction. However, the edited image closely resembles the original, indicating no overediting. | 0 | 8 | The overall image is well-generated with no significant distortions or unusual body parts. The objects maintain a natural shape and the different elements seem harmonized. However, there is a slight unnatural blur on the paintings and some minor edge artifacts, particularly noticeable on the basket and lamp. | 0 | ||
90,731 | Remove the lamp | 10 | 9 | The lamp on the left side of the living room has been removed perfectly. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged with minimal alterations. | 9 | 9 | The image is mostly free of distortions and unusual shapes. The proportions of objects and furniture are natural, and the alignment appears correct. There is no notable blurring of objects. Some minor inconsistencies in lighting and shadow could be improved for better harmony. | 9 | ||
90,731 | Remove the plant | 10 | 9 | The plant on the right side of the image has been successfully removed. The scene follows the editing instruction perfectly. There is minimal overediting, as the rest of the image remains largely unchanged. | 9 | 9 | The image is very well-rendered with no noticeable distortions or unusual body parts. The objects and furniture are well proportioned. There are some very minor blending issues with the right cushion on the couch and the lamp in front of the window. Overall, the image is highly detailed and harmonized. | 9 | ||
169,982 | Remove police officer | 9 | 8 | The police officer has been successfully removed, with the background effectively filled in to match the street scene. However, the new person on the motorcycle stands out slightly, indicating some degree of overediting compared to the original. | 8 | 5 | The image has several noticeable artifacts. The woman's facial features on the left are blurred, the proportions of the motorcycle seem slightly off with an unusually oversized fuel tank, and the license plate shows some distortions. Additionally, the backpack on the woman in the center seems unnaturally flat against h... | 6.324555 | ||
169,982 | Remove woman | 9 | 9 | The woman has been removed effectively, and the scene looks natural. However, there is minor evidence of her previous presence in the motorcycle area's shadows and lighting. | 9 | 9 | The image shows minimal distortions and the subjects appear harmonized. The motorcycle and vehicles look natural with proper proportions and no noticeable artifacts. The only slight issue is a minor blur on the distant vehicles which is negligible. | 9 | ||
169,982 | Remove motorcycle | 9 | 9 | The motorcycle has been successfully removed, and the scene now shows just the police officer standing on the street. The removal is well done but noticeable. The overall composition and setting of the image remain largely unchanged, hence minimal overediting. | 9 | 5 | The image contains noticeable distortions and proportions issues. The legs of the person in uniform appear unnaturally elongated, and there are artifacts around the feet. The body proportions are inconsistent. The face of the person in uniform is somewhat blurred, and the harmony between subjects is lacking. | 6.708204 | ||
169,982 | Remove white van | 10 | 9 | The white van has been successfully removed from the second image, matching the editing instruction accurately. However, there is a slight discrepancy in the background details suggesting minimal overediting. | 9 | 6 | The image has a few noticeable artifacts: the person on the right has an unnatural arm posture, the police officer's face is slightly blurred, and the motorcycle has unusual shape inconsistencies. The background elements are generally well-formed. | 7.348469 | ||
169,982 | Remove helmet | 9 | 9 | The helmet has been successfully removed from the hands of the traffic officer, but a bit of blurring can be seen, indicating slight overediting. The scene still remains largely unchanged, keeping the context of the original image. | 9 | 7 | The AI-generated image displays good overall quality with subjects that appear mostly natural. However, there are some noticeable distortions such as the woman’s arm on the left which appears merged with her torso, and the number plate text on the motorcycle showing distortion. These artifacts reduce the overall effect... | 7.937254 | ||
163,418 | Remove bucket | 10 | 10 | The bucket has been removed completely, and the edited image appears almost identical to the original except for the removal of the bucket. | 10 | 9 | The image is largely artifact-free with natural object shapes and proportions. There are no noticeable distortions or blurred areas. The subjects and objects are well harmonized. The only minor point is the slight blur on the object in the middle background. | 9.486833 | ||
163,418 | Remove chairs | 10 | 10 | The chairs have been successfully removed from the edited image, and there are no other noticeable changes, making it a minimal yet effective edit. | 10 | 8 | Overall, the image is of high quality with minimal distortions. However, the light reflections on the floor look slightly inconsistent, and the shadows and reflections appear somewhat unnatural. Additionally, the transition between the different rooms seems a bit unclear. | 8.944272 | ||
163,418 | Remove door | 0 | 10 | The door in the original image is still present in the edited image, indicating that the editing instruction to remove the door was not followed at all. However, because the images are identical, there was no overediting. | 0 | 9 | The image exhibits a high level of technical quality with no obvious distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The objects and floor are well defined and clear, and the lighting appears consistent. There is slight blurring or lack of detail in the background room, but it is minimal and does not signi... | 0 | ||
163,418 | Remove tools | 7 | 8 | The tools have mostly been removed from the second image, but some traces are still visible, indicating partial success. The edited image closely resembles the original, maintaining the overall scene with minimal overediting. | 7 | 9 | The image is mostly artifact-free, with well-defined object shapes and no significant distortions. The proportions and shapes appear natural. However, there is a slight blur in the reflection areas on the floor tiles that could be improved. | 7.937254 | ||
163,418 | Remove window | 2 | 8 | The windows are still present in the edited image but appear slightly darker. The instruction to remove them is not successfully executed. However, the changes are minimal, preserving the original scene well. | 2 | 10 | The image shows no visible distortions, unusual proportions, unnatural object shapes, blurred faces, or harmony issues. It appears artifact-free. | 4.472136 | ||
126,953 | Remove the trees | 9 | 9 | The trees have been mostly removed in the second image, effectively following the editing instruction. The structural details of the buildings and the overall scene have been minimally altered, preserving the original composition well. | 9 | 9 | The architectural structures and details are well-defined, with proper proportions and no visible distortions. The human figures are appropriately scaled and positioned, although minor blurring is present on some faces upon close inspection. | 9 | ||
126,953 | Remove the columns | 5 | 6 | The columns have been removed effectively, but the area where the columns were is poorly handled, causing an unnatural patch on the building. The overall scene remains mostly the same, but the edited area stands out as somewhat unnatural. | 5 | 8 | The image demonstrates minimal AI artifacts. The structure and proportions of buildings are mostly accurate; however, some distortions are seen in the wall of the left building. Minor blurring and unnatural shapes can be observed, but overall, the harmonization of objects and people is effective. | 6.324555 | ||
126,953 | Remove the sky | 0 | 8 | The instruction to remove the sky was not followed as the sky is still present, albeit with a different color. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged. | 0 | 7 | The overall structure and architectural details are well-rendered, with minimal distortions and no unusual object shapes. However, there are slight distortions around the columns and irregularities in the blending of the sky and the buildings. The grass appears somewhat unnatural, and the people have some blurred and i... | 0 | ||
161,461 | Remove presenter | 9 | 9 | The presenter has been successfully removed, and the scene remains almost identical, maintaining the integrity of the original image. | 9 | 9 | The image appears mostly artifact-free, with well-rendered human figures and a clear, well-defined environment. Minor discrepancies are present in some background details, but they do not significantly impact the overall quality. | 9 | ||
161,461 | Remove projector screen | 10 | 10 | The projector screen has been successfully removed from the scene, and the rest of the image remains unchanged. | 10 | 8 | The image overall appears well-rendered, with well-defined subjects and minimal distortions. However, there are slight issues with some unnatural body proportions and minor blending issues, particularly with the faces and some background elements. | 8.944272 | ||
161,461 | Remove tree branch | 10 | 9 | The tree branch in the edited image has been effectively removed, and the surroundings remain largely the same with minimal overediting. | 9 | 8 | The image has overall good quality with minimal artifacts. However, there are some minor distortions and unusual shapes, particularly in the background and some audience members, which prevent it from achieving a perfect score. | 8.485281 | ||
161,461 | Remove shed | 2 | 8 | The shed is still visible in the edited image, indicating a poor execution of the shed removal instruction. However, there is minimal alteration to the rest of the image, suggesting a minimal overediting. | 2 | 9 | The image appears to be of high quality with minimal distortion. The body parts and proportions of the subjects seem natural. The objects have appropriate shapes, and the faces are clear and not blurred. The subjects are well-integrated into the scene without noticeable anomalies. A minor imperfection in the background... | 4.24264 | ||
161,461 | Remove audience | 0 | 10 | The audience is still present in the edited image. The scene remains largely unchanged, hence no overediting. | 0 | 8 | The image is largely free of distortions and unnatural object shapes. However, there are some noticeable issues with the blending of elements and slight blurriness in certain areas, particularly in the audience. The subjects are mostly harmonized, but a few minor artifacts are present. | 0 |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4