text stringlengths 1.28k 6k |
|---|
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
, appellant is asserting about a right which existed
and is seeking to safeguard and continue to exercise such right –
Case pleaded is not to the effect that any of them own the drain but
that the respondent is seeking to alter that position and thus, be
restrained – Such relief is to be considered ... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
and
circumstances of the present case.
D
14. For the· reasons, as discussed above, we are not
inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the
High Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The bail
granted to the appellant Indra Vijay Alok is cancelled. The trial
E court shall take hi... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 226 of 2010)
APRIL 04
Applicant: AJIT KAUR @ SURJIT KAUR
Court: finding to be reviewed by this Court in the instant appeal.
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, claim of the appellant-daughter
from the second marriage, that property orally gifted to her mother
by her father in 1950, became her moth... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 5 495 498 EN.pdf
Applicant: STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
sed – Revision – Dismissed by the Additional Director
General of Police – Writ petition thereagainst filed by the respondent
– Dismissed by Single Judge – Division Bench... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2015 9 126 137 EN.pdf
Applicant: HARAM CHAND
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
in para (2) of the affidavit about
the incident which took place in 2011 and, thereafter, security B
arrangement was reviewed with the Delhi Police and a
decision was taken on the administr... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2021 11 954 967 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A VINOD KUMAR
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
before it can bring a
case under S. 300, “Thirdly”; first, it must establish, quite objectively,
that a bodily injury is present; secondly, the nature of the injury
must be proved... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 2 415 433 EN.pdf
Applicant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON LONDON BRANCH A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, application for registration
of Reference by respondent no. l company - Dismissal of, by
Registrar, Secretary and Chairman of the Board, on the ground
that res... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2015 10 325 333 EN.pdf
Applicant: STEEL COMPANY LTD. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
nd school bus - School
bus is used for carrying the children wards of the employees
0
of the appellant from and to educational institutions purely
as welfare measure - Tipping tru... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2021 7 710 730 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED
AND ANOTHER
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the case on hand, the impugned
B
order passed by the Division Bench dismissing the appeal and
confirming the order passed by the Si... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2015 9 36 55 EN.pdf
Applicant: A CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the case, it is manifest that the
instrument of mortgage came into existence only after
separate loan ·agreements were executed by the
borrower with the lenders w... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 14 704 715 EN.pdf
Applicant: the accused
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
in directions to the Tamil
Nadu State Election Commission was challenged – It was claimed
D therein that the State Government was deliberately postponing
elections; unconstitutionally alte... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2023 10 742 757 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A THE MADRAS ALUMINIUM CO. LTD.
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, it is not open for the respondents to contend
that the petitioner is not liable for the refund of the amount deposited
under protest towards the bills so gener... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
and circumstances of the instant case is disproportionate
to the charges levelled against the appellant. It is submitted that the
female constable – Rupasi Barman has been awarded punishment of
forfeiture of two years’ seniority in the rank of constable and forfeiture
of two years’ service ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 8 626 629 EN.pdf
Applicant: A APPARAJU MALHAR RAO
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, High Court did not frame
C any substantial question of law as is required to be framed at the
time of admission of the second appeal and allowed the second
appeal filed by respo... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
need mention hereinbelow in brief to appreciate
the controversy involved in these appeals.
3. On 26.07.1989, the State Government made a reference under
Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Industrial Tribunal,
Kota for deciding the following disputes which read as under:
“Whet... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 3 663 672 EN.pdf
Applicant: RITU BHATIA A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
and circumstances of the case, the High court committed a
grave error in approving the order of termination on the ground that the
appellant was not having the requisite qualification of ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2021 9 152 162 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A ANJALI RATHI AND OTHERS
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
before this Court reveals
that the petitioners have participated in the proceedings before
D
the RP and later, the CoC. The Resolution Plan which has been
submitted by ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 1 94 99 EN.pdf
Applicant: ANR.
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
taken note of supra,
we consider it just and reasonable to award a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rs.One lakh) to the respondent in lieu of his right to claim re-instatement
and back wages in full and final ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: None
Applicant: PERIYASAMI AND ORS.
Court: absence of such satisfaction, the court should
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, in FIR or
in the statements recorded u/s. 161, the names of the appellants or
any other description not given so as to identify them – Allegations
in the FIR are vague – No... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
of this case, our attention is not
drawn to any of the specific provision under the
Registration Act empowering the Registrar to entertain
a document of cancellation for registration on the ground
B
that the sale .consideration was not paid and
consequently, received by the vendor. Fu... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 2 645 661 EN.pdf
Applicant: SURESH SINGHAL A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
and circumstances of the case, we find it difficult
c to accept that the murder of Shyam Sunder and Kishan Lal
had been preplanned. Had Suresh Singhal and his father late
Pritpal Singh... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2023 3 107 111 EN.pdf
Applicant: ANR. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the case on hand,
more particularly, the fact that physical possession of the subject land
has been taken over and in fact the subject land has been put to use by
the beneficiary department –... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
of the case.
D
Dismissing the appeal, the Court
HELD : 1. The ASI after producing the case property before
the Court, returned the case property to PW-3 with the seals
intact. ASI was not in possession of seals of either of the
investigating officer or of PW-3. Therfore, the question of
E
tampering ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: None
Applicant: STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: instant appeal, the State contended that High Court erred in
FACTS OF THE CASE:
. ‘Attempt’ is the direct movement towards the
commission after the preparations are over. It is essential to prove
that the attempt was with an intent to c... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2016 3 718 743 EN.pdf
Applicant: S MANUELSONS HOTELS
PRIVATE LIMITED
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of
H r
718
M/S MANUELSONS HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF · 719
KERALA
the present case is that for the period that s.3A was in force, no A
building tax was payab... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 12 255 269 EN.pdf
Applicant: ANR. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, on the date of the order passed by the
Rent Controller itself, the entire arrears as directed to be deposited D
by the tenants stood paid and also on the date of the order passed
by the Rent ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 11 739 751 EN.pdf
Applicant: CHENNADI JALAPATHI REDDY A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of a given case
– Evidence of DW-3 (brother of the first respondent) belies the F
allegation of the first respondent that the signature found on Ext.A-
1 is forged – DW-3 ad... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2023 2 1014 1036 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A CARDINAL MAR GEORGE ALENCHERRY
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, the trial
court (at Kakkanad) dismissed the complaint u/s. 203 of Cr.P.C.
with respect to offences u/ss. 409, 418, 420, 465, 467 and 468 of
the IPC, however ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2021 11 1138 1180 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A MANMOHAN NANDA
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
– Appellant intended to travel to the USA –
Appellant was issued a overseas mediclaim business and holiday
policy – The appellant was medically examined at the instance of
re... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
, the High
Court dismissed the appeal. [Para 9][454-F-H]
2. In view of the powers of the Appellate Court under
Section 386 (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the
High Court should have examined the evidence of each
prosecution witnesses on issues arising in the case and the same
s... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2018 11 155 165 EN.pdf
Applicant: ABDUL WAHAB K. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
and evidence of the case or
to direct retrial for that would be destructive of the object and
intent of the section.”
9. In Rahul Agarwal v. Rakesh Jain10, the Court while dealing
F
w... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 33 of 2003
Applicant: The General Manager, M/S Barsua Iron Ore Mines
Court: High Court of Orissa at Cuttack on 19.05.2019 challenging the
FACTS OF THE CASE:
:
4.
The respondent no.3 was employed as a Piece Rated Mazdoor at
Barsua Iron Ore Mines under Rourkela Steel Plant, a unit o... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2015 12 867 881 EN.pdf
Applicant: ORS. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
itnesses- Other circumstances D
of the case read along with .the version of the eye-witnesses
also sufficiently establish that the occurrence took place as
deposed by the eye-witn.esses - Invol... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
, search and
seizure of 11 kgs of intoxicated drug-ganja from the wife and
her husband - Wife apprehended, however, her husband
managed to escape - Trial court
PRECEDENTS TO CONSIDER:
• (1989) 3 SCC 5
<|end_scenario|>
<think>
ISSUE:
Whether the accused is entitled to bail and, if so,... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 7 731 735 EN.pdf
Applicant: ORS. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, in brief, to appreciate the issue
involved in these appeals.
G 3. The dispute in the suit out of which this appeal arises relates to
agricultural lands comprises of Khewat No. 280 Khata No. 35... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 8 869 882 EN.pdf
Applicant: R. S. ANJAYYA GUPTA A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
as well as on
law which ought to receive proper attention of the High Court, the
first instance in exercise of powers u/s.96 of CPC – Additionally,
some of the documents which wer... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
. Further, since the role of the present
accused was not an active one, inasmuch as he only shouted what he
has supposed to have said, he should)n any case, even if conviction be
sustained, be sentenced to the period already undergone, which we are
informed is roughly almost two years i... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2022 2 376 393 EN.pdf
Applicant: OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
3*
B Submissions of Counsel 6*
G
C Analysis 9*
D Conclusion 17*
H * Ed. Note : Pagination is as per the original Judgment.
381
SAMRUDDHI CHS LTD. v. MUMBAI MAHALAXMI CONS... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2015 2 678 686 EN.pdf
Applicant: ORS. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
parity with the six
acquitted accused.
Motive -Absence -Affect of-Held: Mere absence of motive E
does not bring lesser charge.
Dismissing the appeal, the Court
HELD: 1. The two injured eye witne... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2018 9 349 354 EN.pdf
Applicant: STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the case liability cannot be fastened on the respondent-
accused (accused Nos. 2 to 9) – In view of medical evidence it is
evident that accused No.1 was not having intentio... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 7 676 686 EN.pdf
Applicant: A TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMAR
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the case or very scope and object of the legislation under
this Act. Hence, it has to be necessarily held that it is only
concerned District Court, where the society is ... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
with
reference to the number of persons, the place from where he
was witnessing such an assembly, the nature of movement of
the persons gathered in front of his banana shop, his own
statement that he was frightened while looking at such a large
H group of persons and that even according to him ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2017 11 271 362 EN.pdf
Applicant: CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR FCI AND ORS. A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
which are to the
knowledge of the applicant and hence the burden of proof is placed on
the claimant by Section 8.
16. The sta(c legislature was evidently ... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2022 16 609 614 EN.pdf
Applicant: ANR.
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
ourt
on 28.10.2014 – Inspite of this, solely on the ground that the
compensation was not tendered prior to coming into force of the
Act, 2013, High Court declared that the land acquisition with r... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
is not precluded by
s.34(2)(b) and that it was not necessary to consider the application
for amendment –
SUBMISSIONS BY PARTIES:
reliance has been placed on MSP Infrastructure Ltd.
vs. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. reported in
(2015) 13 SCC 713.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
685
4. Learned Ad... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 13 224 227 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A GAURAV HARGOVINDBHAI DAVE
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of the present case, application u/s.
7 is time-barred – There is no equity about limitation – It is not open
D
to the court to interpret Articles of Limitation Act,... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2020 7 117 130 EN.pdf
Applicant: SHYAM SAHNI A
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
which led to filing of this appeal are as follows:-
The appellant filed a civil suit being CS (OS) No.1134 of 2008
before the High Court seeking declaration, permanent injunction and
poss... |
<|scenario|>
LEGAL SCENARIO:
of the respective cases. While the larger question
i.e. qua F\,mdamental Rights was not directly in issue before
the Kerala High Court, in Manuel Theodore D'souza (supra) c
the right to adopt was consistent with the canonical law
applicable to the parties who were Christians by faith. W... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 4522 of 2021)
AUGUST 03
Applicant: TELANGANA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR.
Court: High Court setting
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, suit
by Wakf Board before the Wakf tribunal seeking eviction of tenant
from property belonging to Wakf Institution – Case of the tenant
that suit property not a wakf p... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: None
Applicant: SATYA DEO @ BHOOREY
Court: present case, this Court is
FACTS OF THE CASE:
of this case is to require him to
pay a fine under clause (e) of Section 21(1) of the Juvenile
Justice Act, 1986.”
21. Following the aforesaid ratio and the legal position elucidated
above, whi... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2020 3 1207 1218 EN.pdf
Applicant: MADHYA PRADESH HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE A
DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ANOTHER
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, this Court fails to understand how the modification A
in the layout plan which is in accordance with the Adhiniyam could
ha... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 2019 1 886 919 EN.pdf
Applicant: S.C.R.
A RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Court: Supreme Court of India
FACTS OF THE CASE:
discussed above, the
Commission does not find any merit in altering the MYT norms
for SHR. Therefore, though RInfra-G has proposed a SHR of
D
2,450 kCal/kWh, th... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
being that respondent
no.6 (mother) had the custody of the two minor children, for which
the petitioner (father) had already filed a petition u/s.12 of the
Guardians and Wards Act, which is pending consideration; and the
custody of the children with the mother, who is a natural guardian,
cannot be s... |
<|scenario|>
FACTS:
of the case, the appellant cannot be called upon to answer
something which has transpired 27 years back. The appellant
has already undergone incarceration for a period of 10 years and
4 months. The conviction of the appellant stands vitiated. In the
SUBMISSIONS BY PARTIES:
by the appellant before t... |
<|scenario|>
BAIL APPLICATION
Case: 6262 of 2010)
FEBRUARY 16
Applicant: CORPORATION (GWALIOR) M.P. LTD.
Court: High Court
FACTS OF THE CASE:
, however, need mention to appreciate the same.
3. The appellant is a limited company registered under the
Companies Act. It is a State Government Undertaking which is
establish... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 3,159